The platform

One Data Hub. Eight sections. 60+ datasets. Every report reviewed.

Edulytic is built for ARC-PA accreditation reporting and nothing else. The platform handles translation, organization and analysis. Our analysts and statisticians handle the review. Your program keeps the judgment.

How it works · in detail

The seven-step workflow.

STEP 01

Identify and collect your raw data source files

Pull cohort data from wherever it already sits: LMS exports, vendor reports, preceptor evaluations, surveys, spreadsheets. No new system of record. No integrations to configure. No waiting on IT.

STEP 02

Upload into the Edulytic Data Hub

Files land in eight standard sections built to ARC-PA reporting expectations, so cohorts and years stay comparable.

STEP 03

AI translates and validates

Incoming files are translated into consistent structures. Validation checks formatting, finds missing or inconsistent fields, and flags anomalies before they reach a report.

STEP 04

Analyst and statistician oversight

Analysts and statisticians review both the incoming data and the outputs. They are the MACS consulting team, not a separate vendor.

STEP 05

Reports and Analytical Summaries produced

Every report ships with an Analytical Summary: a written reading of what the data shows, which trends matter, and what they may mean.

STEP 06

Export and use in your accreditation workflow

Outputs export in formats matched to each report type. They go into your SSR drafts and committee packets as they are.

STEP 07

Repeat the cycle, cohort by cohort, year after year

New data goes in each term and the workflow repeats, building a trend record and audit-ready evidence across cycles.

The Data Hub

Aligned to how ARC-PA evaluates your program.

The Data Hub sorts your program data into eight sections that follow ARC-PA’s own evaluation structure. Sections A through H match how reviewers read a program. Upload once, and cohorts and years stay comparable.

SECTION A

Program High-Level Information

Program identity, enrollment, and structural data.

SECTION B

Administrative Aspects of Program & Institutional Resources

Policy, governance, institutional resources, and operational reporting.

SECTION C

Effectiveness of Didactic Curriculum

Course and instructor evaluations, final didactic grades, and remediation policy.

SECTION D

Effectiveness of Clinical Curriculum

Site and preceptor evaluations, final clinical grades, and clinical-year remediation policy.

SECTION E

Preparation of Graduates to Achieve Program-Defined Competencies

Competency tracking, summative evaluation, and exit surveys.

SECTION F

PANCE Performance

NCCPA PANCE Performance Summary Report, attrition, PACKRAT 1 and 2, EOR and EOC scores. The outcomes ARC-PA reads most closely.

SECTION G

Sufficiency and Effectiveness of Principal and Instructional Faculty and Staff

Faculty-student ratios, sufficiency surveys, and workload documentation. Maps to the Sixth Edition sufficiency standard.

SECTION H

Success in Meeting Program’s Goals

Goal-by-goal tracking against program-defined benchmarks.

Why the Analytical Summary matters

Every report ships with a written interpretation of what it shows.

Most analytics platforms produce dashboards. A dashboard gives you the numbers and leaves the reading of them to someone on your team.

Edulytic produces the dashboards and the Analytical Summary. Every report carries a written reading of the results, the trends across cohorts, and what they may mean for the program. The platform drafts it. Analysts and statisticians review it.

Your Assessment Director is not writing that narrative from scratch the night before a committee meeting. It arrives with the report.

Predictive PANCE Analytics

Earlier visibility into which cohorts may signal risk.

Most early-alert systems flag a student once the grade is in and the intervention is harder. Predicted PANCE Risk Scores read PACKRAT, EOR, course outcomes and historical PANCE data to surface the pattern earlier in the cohort.

That is early enough to act on, rather than after the cohort has graduated or the PANCE report comes back below benchmark.

Self-Study Report support

Built to feed the SSR, not just to track outcomes.

The outputs are built for ARC-PA reporting, the Self-Study Report included. The cohort trend record, the Analytical Summaries and the audit-ready evidence across cycles are what an SSR draws on.

Parts of the SSR sit outside the platform and your program will write them. Edulytic does not replace internal decision-making, committee review or institutional accountability. It replaces the data handling that crowds them out.

ARC-PA Sixth Edition

When faculty time stops going to spreadsheets, faculty sufficiency improves.

The Sixth Edition sets explicit requirements for faculty workload and sufficiency. Section G of the Data Hub maps to that standard.

There is a second effect worth naming. Hours a faculty member no longer spends collating data and assembling reports come off the workload documentation, and that documentation is what the sufficiency standard gets read against.

Standards alignment

Reporting outputs aligned to both editions.

Outputs are aligned to both the Fifth Edition and the Sixth. The Data Hub structure, the report library and the Analytical Summaries carry a program through the transition without a rebuild when the standards shift.

Scope

What we don’t do.

Edulytic does not replace your program’s internal decision-making or committee review. It does not remove your responsibility for oversight and documentation. It is not a general analytics platform retrofitted for PA programs.

Book a demo

See it on your program’s data.

Thirty minutes with the Edulytic team. We can work from a sample dataset, or from a recent reporting cycle of yours to see it on real structure.